From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: laforge@gnumonks.org, davej@redhat.com, jbenc@suse.cz,
josejx@gentoo.org, mbuesch@freenet.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Broadcom 43xx first results
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:45:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43962281.2050707@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051206.151919.72043193.davem@davemloft.net>
David S. Miller wrote:
> I'm at the point where I frankly don't care which softmac
> implementation we go with, but rather I'm more concerned that we pick
> _ONE_ and just stick with it, and then adding the necessary interfaces
> and infrastructure as different wireless devices require.
>
> Yes, you hear me right, it's more important to agree to one
> implementation as the basis, even if it's the worst one currently.
> Division of labor is something we simply cannot afford on the wireless
> stack at this time.
Agreed.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-12-06 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1Eiyw4-0003Ab-FW@www1.emo.freenet-rz.de>
2005-12-05 18:00 ` Broadcom 43xx first results Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 18:14 ` Michael Renzmann
2005-12-05 18:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 18:49 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 18:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 19:11 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-06 7:17 ` Michael Renzmann
[not found] ` <20051205190038.04b7b7c1-IhiK2ZEFs2oCVLCxKZUutA@public.gmane.org>
2005-12-05 18:38 ` Joseph Jezak
2005-12-05 18:55 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 19:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 19:18 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 19:53 ` Dave Jones
2005-12-05 20:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-06 15:10 ` Harald Welte
2005-12-06 19:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-07 7:16 ` Harald Welte
2005-12-06 23:19 ` David S. Miller
2005-12-06 23:45 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-12-07 13:34 ` Michael Buesch
2005-12-08 11:32 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-08 12:07 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-08 12:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-12-08 13:03 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 19:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-05 19:31 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-05 19:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-12-05 20:11 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-06 15:09 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-06 16:43 ` Ben Greear
2005-12-06 23:25 ` David S. Miller
2005-12-06 19:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-06 15:04 ` Pavel Machek
2005-12-08 0:00 ` Michael Wu
2005-12-08 1:05 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-12-05 20:23 ` Michael Buesch
2005-12-05 20:42 ` Jiri Benc
2005-12-06 9:26 ` Kyle Moffett
2005-12-06 10:23 ` Luc Saillard
2005-12-06 22:47 Jean Tourrilhes
2005-12-07 7:11 ` Jouni Malinen
2005-12-07 19:16 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2005-12-07 19:47 ` Jouni Malinen
2005-12-07 19:05 ` Jean Tourrilhes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43962281.2050707@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jbenc@suse.cz \
--cc=josejx@gentoo.org \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbuesch@freenet.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).