From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Wireless: One small step towards a more perfect union...?
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:37:09 -0500
Message-ID: <43C58895.4080006@pobox.com>
References: <20060106042218.GA18974@havoc.gtf.org> <20060111020534.GA22285@tuxdriver.com> <43C5869A.5080107@gentoo.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S932399AbWAKWhW@vger.kernel.org>
To: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <43C5869A.5080107@gentoo.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Daniel Drake wrote:
> FWIW, my opinion is that the devicescape code should be broken down and 
> used to extend the existing stack, no matter how 'good' it is. The way 
> it has been developed (i.e. totally outside of the ieee80211 stack) is 
> somewhat insulting to our development process.

Strongly agreed, though perhaps some of the blame rests on me for 
letting ieee80211 sit around too long without a clear maintainer...

	Jeff