netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppp: don't use 0 in pointer context
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:00:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43EA7808.6060105@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060208.144712.66821895.davem@davemloft.net>

David S. Miller wrote:
> From: David Stevens <dlstevens@us.ibm.com>
> Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 14:45:08 -0800
> 
> 
>>        Why would sparse complain about this? 0 is a well-defined
>>pointer value (the only value guaranteed to be by the language).
> 
> 
> Because sparse goes beyond the standards and tries to
> catch cases that usually end up being bugs.

So, how might it tell when someone is mistakenly using a pointer as a boolean if 
it takes a pass on if(foo) or if(!foo)  instead of looking for if(foo == NULL) 
or if(foo != NULL)?    (or I suppose if (NULL == foo) and if (NULL != foo))

it would seem that the compars with NULL, when read by pseudorandom folks would 
be more likely to reinforce that foo is a pointer rather than a boolean/flag.

rick jones

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-02-08 23:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-02-08 22:28 [PATCH] ppp: don't use 0 in pointer context Alexey Dobriyan
2006-02-08 22:14 ` James Carlson
2006-02-08 22:19   ` Herbert Xu
2006-02-08 22:45     ` David Stevens
2006-02-08 22:47       ` David S. Miller
2006-02-08 22:51         ` Paul Mackerras
2006-02-08 23:00         ` Rick Jones [this message]
2006-02-08 23:08         ` Herbert Xu
2006-02-08 23:22       ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-02-08 23:26         ` Paul Mackerras
2006-02-08 23:49         ` Herbert Xu
2006-02-08 23:58           ` David S. Miller
2006-02-09  0:05             ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-02-09  0:06             ` Herbert Xu
2006-02-08 22:23   ` Roland Dreier
2006-02-08 22:44   ` Paul Mackerras
2006-02-09 13:15     ` James Carlson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43EA7808.6060105@hp.com \
    --to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).