Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tim Menninger <tmenninger@purestorage.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Return -ENODEV when C45 not supported
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 17:07:53 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <440652f1-428a-42f3-bb5e-d14d74cf5e3b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240204-unify-c22-c45-scan-error-handling-v2-2-0273623f9c57@lunn.ch>



On 2/4/2024 3:14 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> MDIO bus drivers can return -ENODEV when they know the bus does not
> have a device at the given address, e.g. because of hardware
> limitation. One such limitation is that the bus does not support C45
> at all. This is more efficient than returning 0xffff, since it
> immediately stops the probing on the given address, where as further
> reads can be made when 0xffff is returned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-05  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-04 23:14 [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Unify C22 and C45 error handling during bus enumeration Andrew Lunn
2024-02-04 23:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] net: phy: c45 scanning: Don't consider -ENODEV fatal Andrew Lunn
2026-04-07 18:15   ` Charles Perry
2026-04-07 18:57     ` Andrew Lunn
2024-02-04 23:14 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Return -ENODEV when C45 not supported Andrew Lunn
2024-02-05  1:07   ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2024-02-07 13:50 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] Unify C22 and C45 error handling during bus enumeration patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=440652f1-428a-42f3-bb5e-d14d74cf5e3b@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tmenninger@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox