From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 21:36:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4409FA66.7010802@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1141498341.5185.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
jamal wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-03 at 17:56 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>>Adrian Bunk wrote:
>>
>>>This option should IMHO no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL.
>>>
>>
>>Yesterday I managed to crash my machine playing around with tc actions
>>within minutes. I haven't looked into it yet, but it seems it still
>>needs more testing.
>
>
> Simple: Fix the bug and submit a patch. If you cant find the cause post
> what you are doing.
I'll fix it.
> What is the metric for going from experimental to non-experimental?
> I surely hope it doesnt come to some irrational reasoning like
> "Patrick found a bug"[1].
I think a sane metric is "opinion of people who know the code". But
I don't care much, I don't think many people care whether something
is maked experimental or not.
> [1]If you used half of that logic on netfilter it would still be
> experimental or rather should be demoted to experimental.
I'll take that as a compliment :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-04 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-04 16:07 [RFC: 2.6 patch] let NET_CLS_ACT no longer depend on EXPERIMENTAL Adrian Bunk
2006-03-04 16:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-03-04 18:52 ` jamal
2006-03-04 20:36 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-03-10 11:04 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-12 17:56 Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4409FA66.7010802@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).