netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Hefty <mshefty@ichips.intel.com>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 4/6 v2] IB: address translation to map	IP toIB addresses (GIDs)
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:08:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44206B53.8020701@ichips.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adabqvza53f.fsf@cisco.com>

Roland Dreier wrote:
>  > +struct workqueue_struct *rdma_wq;
>  > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_wq);
> 
> Sean, I don't think I saw an answer when I asked you this before.  Why
> is ib_addr exporting a workqueue?  Is there some sort of ordering
> constraint that is forcing other modules to go through the same
> workqueue for things?
> 
> This seems like a very fragile internal thing to be exposing, and I'm
> wondering if there's a better way to handle it.

I responded in a different thread, but here's what I wrote:

"This is simply an attempt to reduce/combine work queues used by the Infiniband 
code.  This keeps the threading a little simpler in the rdma_cm, since all 
callbacks are invoked using the same work queue.  (I'm also using this with the 
local SA/multicast code, but that's not ready for merging.)"

There's no specific ordering constraint that's required.  We're just ending up 
with several Infiniband modules creating their own work queues (ib_mad, ib_cm, 
ib_addr, rdma_cm, plus a couple more in modules under development), and this is 
an attempt to reduce that.  If having separate work queues would work better, 
there shouldn't be anything that prevents this.

- Sean

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-21 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <ORSMSX401FRaqbC8wSA0000000d@orsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
2006-03-11  1:14 ` [PATCH 4/6 v2] IB: address translation to map IP toIB addresses (GIDs) Roland Dreier
2006-03-11  6:10   ` Sean Hefty
2006-03-21 20:57 ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-21 21:08   ` Sean Hefty [this message]
2006-03-21 22:39     ` Roland Dreier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44206B53.8020701@ichips.intel.com \
    --to=mshefty@ichips.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openib-general@openib.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).