From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 03:02:12 +0100 Message-ID: <44235324.3080607@trash.net> References: <20060324001307.GO22727@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, zhaojingmin@users.sourceforge.net, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Jing Min Zhao , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Adrian Bunk In-Reply-To: <20060324001307.GO22727@stusta.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org [The hotmail address of the author doesn't work, CCed sourceforge-address] Adrian Bunk wrote: > Two comments on the H.323 conntrack/NAT helper: > - the function prototypes in ip_nat_helper_h323.c are _ugly_, > please move them to a header file Their ugliness is because of the current API, which cleaned up quite a lot of the surrounding code, but requires this ugliness from each helper. I would like to keep them visible as a reminder that a cleaner solution is wanted, but moving them to header files certainly sound like a good idea to eliminate the risk of prototype conflicts. But please do this for all helpers at once. > - is there a reason for not using EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL? I would prefer that too.