From: Peter Horton <phorton@bitbox.co.uk>
To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Cc: "P. Horton" <pdh@colonel-panic.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] Add MWI workaround for Tulip DC21143
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:39:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4427DCE4.4000807@bitbox.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060327070112.GA10906@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com> [2006-03-09 23:44]:
>
>>> So when compiling for Cobalt, we work around the hardware bug, while for other
>>> platforms, we just disable MWI?
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be possible to always (I mean, when a rev 65 chip is detected)
>>> work around the bug?
>>>
>> Of course it is possible but it is not the same semantic as the initial
>> patch (not that I know if it is right or not).
>>
>> So:
>> - does the issue exist beyond Cobalt hosts ?
>> - is the fix Cobalt-only ?
>>
>
> I don't think anyone has replied to this message yet. My
> understanding is that it's not Cobalt only but a problem in a specific
> revision of the chip, which the Cobalt happens to use. However, I'd
> be glad if somone else could comment. Peter, you read the errata
> right?
>
According to the errata it applies to all DEC 21143-PD and 21143-TD
which are the chips with the revision code 0x41 (65). The errata states
the receive buffers should not end on a cache aligned boundary when
using MWI otherwise the receiver will not close the last descriptor.
P.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-27 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060129230816.GD4094@colonel-panic.org>
[not found] ` <20060218220851.GA1601@colonel-panic.org>
2006-03-06 22:51 ` [PATCH, RESEND] Add MWI workaround for Tulip DC21143 Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-06 23:15 ` Francois Romieu
2006-03-07 3:58 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-03-07 9:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-03-08 22:41 ` Francois Romieu
2006-03-09 9:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-03-09 22:44 ` Francois Romieu
2006-03-27 7:01 ` Martin Michlmayr
2006-03-27 12:39 ` Peter Horton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4427DCE4.4000807@bitbox.co.uk \
--to=phorton@bitbox.co.uk \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pdh@colonel-panic.org \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
--cc=tbm@cyrius.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).