From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" Subject: Re: [PATCH]: e1000: prevent statistics from getting garbled during reset. Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 11:40:16 -0700 Message-ID: <442D7790.2010300@wolfmountaingroup.com> References: <20060330213928.GQ2172@austin.ibm.com> <20060331000208.GS2172@austin.ibm.com> <442C8069.507@wolfmountaingroup.com> <20060331003506.GU2172@austin.ibm.com> <442CACC0.1060308@wolfmountaingroup.com> <20060331170319.GV2172@austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, john.ronciak@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, Jeff Garzik Return-path: To: Linas Vepstas In-Reply-To: <20060331170319.GV2172@austin.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Linas Vepstas wrote: >On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 09:14:56PM -0700, Jeffrey V. Merkey wrote: > > >>Yes, we need one. The adapter needs to maintain these stats from the >>registers in the kernel structure and not >>its own local variables. >> >> > >Did you read the code to see what the adapter does with these stats? >Among other things, it uses them to adaptively modulate transmit rates >to avoid collisions. Just clearing the hardware-private stats will mess >up that function. > > > I noticed that. >>That way, when someone calls to clear the stats >>for testing and analysis purposes, >>they zero out and are reset. >> >> > >1) ifdown/ifup is guarenteed to to clear things. Try that. > > No, not dynamic. I'll patch the driver locally, thanks. Jeff >2) What's wrong with taking deltas? Typical through-put performance >measurement is done by pre-loading the pipes (i.e. running for >a few minutes wihtout measuring, then starting the measurement). >I'd think that snapshotting the numbers would be easier, and is >trivially doable in user-space. I guess I don't understand why >you need a new kernel featre to imlement this. > >--linas > > >