From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] e1000: Driver fixes and update to 7.0.38-k2 Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:01:53 -0400 Message-ID: <443FF1A1.4000204@pobox.com> References: <20060414183423.3461.32772.stgit@gitlost.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "Miller, David" , "Ronciak, John" , "Brandeburg, Jesse" , "Kirsher, Jeff" , "Kok, Auke" Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:64387 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751415AbWDNTB5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:01:57 -0400 To: "Kok, Auke" In-Reply-To: <20060414183423.3461.32772.stgit@gitlost.site> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Kok, Auke wrote: > Hi, > > This patch series implements two fixes, a series of cleanups and > two optimization patches. > > The version of the driver was bumped to 7.0.38-k2. Year changes to 2006. > > As I'm taking over patch duties from Jeff Kirsher, I added myself > to the MAINTAINERS file. > > These changes are available through git. > > Jeff, please pull from: > > git://63.64.152.142/~ahkok/git/netdev-2.6 e1000-7.0.38-k2 > > > Cheers, > > Auke Kok > > > --- > 01/10: [FIX] Remove PM warning DPRINTKs breaking 2.4.x kernels > 02/10: [FIX] Esb2 wol link cycle bug and uninitialized registers > 03/10: [PATCH] De-inline functions to benefit from compiler smartness > 04/10: [PATCH] Made an adapter struct variable into a local (txb2b) > 05/10: [PATCH] Update truesize with the length of the packet for > packet split > 06/10: [PATCH] Dead variable cleanup > 07/10: [PATCH] Buffer optimizations for small MTU > 08/10: [PATCH] implement more efficient tx queue locking > 09/10: [DOC] Version bump, contact fix, year string change > 10/10: [MAINTAINERS] {e100{,0},ixgb}: Add Auke Kok as new patch maintainer These 10 patches look OK, but since the current kernel version is 2.6.17-rc1, that means we are in "bug fix only" mode right now. Should I (a) apply these all to netdev2-.6.git#upstream, queueing them for 2.6.18, or (b) let you split the submission into two parts, bug fixes only and everything else? Jeff