netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] Security marking
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:55:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4443E498.4010301@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604171440480.17563@d.namei>

James Morris wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
> 
>>>From a pure netfilter POV it would still be nice to have the socket
>>hooks for userspace queueing in socket context and filtering hard
>>to track protocols. My only question is: if I would port the skfilter
>>patches to the current kernel today and fix the unresolved issues,
>>would you still prefer this approach?
> 
> 
> I think the newer model of marking the packets first via Netfilter then 
> interpreting them at the socket layer is superior.  i.e. skfilter is 
> probably not preferred for SELinux now.
> 
> However, it's still useful for incoming user matching for things like 
> user-level firewalling.

OK, thanks. I plan to make it ready for submission eventually, just
wanted to make sure I'm not holding back things.

  reply	other threads:[~2006-04-17 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-04-16  5:10 [PATCH][RFC] Security marking James Morris
2006-04-16  5:28 ` James Morris
2006-04-17 17:51 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-04-17 18:43   ` James Morris
2006-04-17 18:55     ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-04-19 22:49 ` David S. Miller
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-17 18:40 edwin
2006-04-18  1:01 ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4443E498.4010301@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).