From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernard Pidoux Subject: Re: [ROSE] Fix routing table locking in rose_remove_neigh. Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 00:59:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4453EFE3.4070302@ccr.jussieu.fr> References: <20060429133141.GA31820@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.28]:13736 "EHLO smtp2-g19.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750821AbWD2XAK (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 19:00:10 -0400 To: Ralf Baechle In-Reply-To: <20060429133141.GA31820@linux-mips.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Ralf Baechle wrote: > The locking rule for rose_remove_neigh() are that the called needs to > hold rose_neigh_list_lock, so we better don't take it yet again in > rose_neigh_list_lock. > > Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle All ROSE and HZ patches applied to kernel 2.6.16 Many thanks Ralf. 73 de Bernard, f6bvp http://f6bvp.org http://rose.fpac.free.fr/MINI-HOWTO/ http://rose.fpac.free.fr/MINI-HOWTO-FR/