From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: latest -stable breaks Squid Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 18:22:21 -0700 Message-ID: <4459574D.6000303@candelatech.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dave Jones , netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, fedora-list@list.zikzak.de, fedoralist@kotoulas.de Return-path: Received: from ns2.lanforge.com ([66.165.47.211]:45244 "EHLO ns2.lanforge.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750723AbWEDBWq (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 May 2006 21:22:46 -0400 To: Herbert Xu In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Herbert Xu wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > >>So I pushed out an update for Fedora Core 5 users yesterday >>that moved the kernel from 2.6.16.9 to 2.6.16.13. >>I've since heard "My network performance is awful", and worse >>yet, some apps seem broken as in the report below. >> >>Anyone have any ideas ? > > > Try reverting the e1000 truesize patch. Although the fix is 100% > correct, it might have a negative impact on user-space apps with > particuarly small rcvbuf settings. Prior to the fix, due to the > incorrect accounting we are essentially enlarging rcvbuf by as much > as 10 times. At least one of the reports shows problems with non e1000 NICs, so it's probably not just the e1000 change. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190620 Ben > > Cheers, -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com