From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Greear Subject: Re: 2.6.16.13 e1000 reports incorrect PCI-X bus speed? Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 15:26:02 -0700 Message-ID: <44650B7A.70209@candelatech.com> References: <4464FB01.6070206@candelatech.com> <4464FF41.7060000@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ns2.lanforge.com ([66.165.47.211]:36744 "EHLO ns2.lanforge.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932263AbWELW0L (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 May 2006 18:26:11 -0400 To: Auke Kok In-Reply-To: <4464FF41.7060000@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Auke Kok wrote: > obviously 120 is missing, but PCI-E speeds are also missing (2500gbps). The > output of the e1000 module is correct. Any idea why 120Mhz is used instead of 133? It doesn't seem to matter in my performance tests, but I am curious... Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com