From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Developer <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: sky2 hw csum failure [was Re: sky2 large MTU problems]
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 12:35:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44758881.1020106@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060524103820.2e213a0b@localhost.localdomain>
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 24 May 2006 10:28:52 +0100
> "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Having done some more stress testing with sky2 1.4 (in 2.6.17-rc4) and
>>the latest patch, I have found problems when streaming lots of data
>>out of the sky2 interface (eg via samba serving a large file to GigE
>>client). Ultimately, the interface will stop sending.
>>
>>Before this happens, I see lots of:
>>
>>kernel: lan0: hw csum failure.
>>kernel: [__skb_checksum_complete+86/96] __skb_checksum_complete+0x56/0x60
>>kernel: [tcp_error+300/512] tcp_error+0x12c/0x200
>>kernel: [poison_obj+41/96] poison_obj+0x29/0x60
>>kernel: [tcp_error+0/512] tcp_error+0x0/0x200
>>kernel: [ip_conntrack_in+157/1072] ip_conntrack_in+0x9d/0x430
>>kernel: [kfree_skbmem+8/128] kfree_skbmem+0x8/0x80
>>kernel: [arp_process+102/1408] arp_process+0x66/0x580
>>kernel: [check_poison_obj+36/416] check_poison_obj+0x24/0x1a0
>>kernel: [arp_process+102/1408] arp_process+0x66/0x580
>>kernel: [nf_iterate+99/144] nf_iterate+0x63/0x90
>>kernel: [ip_rcv_finish+0/608] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x260
>>kernel: [nf_hook_slow+89/240] nf_hook_slow+0x59/0xf0
>>kernel: [ip_rcv_finish+0/608] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x260
>>kernel: [ip_rcv+386/1104] ip_rcv+0x182/0x450
>>kernel: [ip_rcv_finish+0/608] ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x260
>>kernel: [packet_rcv_spkt+216/320] packet_rcv_spkt+0xd8/0x140
>>kernel: [netif_receive_skb+476/784] netif_receive_skb+0x1dc/0x310
>>kernel: [sky2_poll+879/2096] sky2_poll+0x36f/0x830
>>kernel: [_spin_lock_irqsave+9/16] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x9/0x10
>>kernel: [run_timer_softirq+290/416] run_timer_softirq+0x122/0x1a0
>>kernel: [net_rx_action+108/256] net_rx_action+0x6c/0x100
>>kernel: [__do_softirq+66/160] __do_softirq+0x42/0xa0
>>kernel: [do_softirq+78/96] do_softirq+0x4e/0x60
>>kernel: =======================
>>kernel: [do_IRQ+90/160] do_IRQ+0x5a/0xa0
>>kernel: [remove_vma+69/80] remove_vma+0x45/0x50
>>kernel: [common_interrupt+26/32] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
>>kernel: [get_offset_pmtmr+151/3584] get_offset_pmtmr+0x97/0xe00
>>kernel: [do_gettimeofday+26/208] do_gettimeofday+0x1a/0xd0
>>kernel: [sys_gettimeofday+26/144] sys_gettimeofday+0x1a/0x90
>>kernel: [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
>
>
> What ever the netfilter chain is, it is trimming or altering the packet
> without clearing or altering the hardware checksum. It is not a driver
> problem, we saw these in VLAN's and ebtables already.
The call chain looks pretty messed up, but the point where an
invalid HW checksum is detected is in TCP connection tracking,
which is basically the first thing netfilter does, unless
you use the raw table. There are no packet modifications done
by conntrack, so I doubt that netfilter is the culprit here.
Of course we had some big checksumming cleanups, so there is
a possibilty of bugs there, but I did test them with sky2 and
HW checksumming, so I don't think thats the case.
Daniel, is there an easy way to reproduce the checksum failure?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-25 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <6278d2220605240228v576dd66atdad4855b308e64bf@mail.gmail.com>
2006-05-24 17:38 ` sky2 hw csum failure [was Re: sky2 large MTU problems] Stephen Hemminger
2006-05-25 9:17 ` Daniel J Blueman
2006-05-25 10:35 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-05-25 10:55 ` Daniel J Blueman
2006-05-25 11:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-05-30 9:10 ` Daniel J Blueman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44758881.1020106@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=daniel.blueman@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).