netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Hefty <mshefty@ichips.intel.com>
To: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Cc: rdreier@cisco.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iWARP Connection Manager.
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 14:09:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <447F5778.6010202@ichips.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1149181233.31610.34.camel@stevo-desktop>

Steve Wise wrote:
>>>+int iw_cm_disconnect(struct iw_cm_id *cm_id, int abrupt)
>>>+{
>>>+	struct iwcm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
>>>+	unsigned long flags;
>>>+	int ret = 0;
>>>+
>>>+	cm_id_priv = container_of(cm_id, struct iwcm_id_private, id);
>>>+	/* Wait if we're currently in a connect or accept downcall */
>>>+	wait_event(cm_id_priv->connect_wait, 
>>>+		   !test_bit(IWCM_F_CONNECT_WAIT, &cm_id_priv->flags));
>>
>>Am I understanding this check correctly?  You're checking to see if the user has 
>>called iw_cm_disconnect() at the same time that they called iw_cm_connect() or 
>>iw_cm_accept().  Are connect / accept blocking, or are you just waiting for an 
>>event?
> 
> 
> The CM must wait for the low level provider to finish a connect() or
> accept() operation before telling the low level provider to disconnect
> via modifying the iwarp QP.  Regardless of whether they block, this
> disconnect can happen concurrently with the connect/accept so we need to
> hold the disconnect until the connect/accept completes.
> 
> 
>>>+EXPORT_SYMBOL(iw_cm_disconnect);
>>>+static void destroy_cm_id(struct iw_cm_id *cm_id)
>>>+{
>>>+	struct iwcm_id_private *cm_id_priv;
>>>+	unsigned long flags;
>>>+	int ret;
>>>+
>>>+	cm_id_priv = container_of(cm_id, struct iwcm_id_private, id);
>>>+	/* Wait if we're currently in a connect or accept downcall. A
>>>+	 * listening endpoint should never block here. */
>>>+	wait_event(cm_id_priv->connect_wait, 
>>>+		   !test_bit(IWCM_F_CONNECT_WAIT, &cm_id_priv->flags));
>>
>>Same question/comment as above.
>>
> 
> 
> Same answer.  

There's a difference between trying to handle the user calling 
disconnect/destroy at the same time a call to accept/connect is active, versus 
the user calling disconnect/destroy after accept/connect have returned.  In the 
latter case, I think you're fine.  In the first case, this is allowing a user to 
call destroy at the same time that they're calling accept/connect. 
Additionally, there's no guarantee that the F_CONNECT_WAIT flag has been set by 
accept/connect by the time disconnect/destroy tests it.

- Sean

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-01 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-31 18:26 [PATCH 0/2][RFC] iWARP Core Support Steve Wise
2006-05-31 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] iWARP Connection Manager Steve Wise
2006-05-31 22:22   ` Sean Hefty
2006-06-01 17:00     ` Steve Wise
2006-06-01 21:09       ` Sean Hefty [this message]
2006-06-01 22:21         ` [openib-general] " Tom Tucker
2006-06-01 17:11     ` Tom Tucker
2006-05-31 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] iWARP Core Changes Steve Wise
2006-05-31 19:17   ` Roland Dreier
2006-05-31 20:30     ` Steve Wise
2006-05-31 20:32       ` Roland Dreier
2006-05-31 21:26   ` Sean Hefty

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=447F5778.6010202@ichips.intel.com \
    --to=mshefty@ichips.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openib-general@openib.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).