From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: suspend / resume fix
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 01:00:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <448E4674.8010605@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060613134552.331377c3@localhost.localdomain>
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> @@ -2183,9 +2190,6 @@ static int sky2_poll(struct net_device *
> int work_done = 0;
> u32 status = sky2_read32(hw, B0_Y2_SP_EISR);
>
> - if (!~status)
> - return 0;
> -
> if (status & Y2_IS_HW_ERR)
> sky2_hw_intr(hw);
>
It's probably better to do "goto end_of_function" than simply return,
but I disagree that this check should be removed.
As long as you are reading values from the hardware, you should include
this 0xffffffff check. It's certainly possible that the controller
could have been unplugged from the time the interrupt handler last ran,
and the time that NAPI poll runs.
> @@ -3427,9 +3429,14 @@ static void __devexit sky2_remove(struct
> static int sky2_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> {
> struct sky2_hw *hw = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - int i;
> + int i, err;
> + u32 imask;
> +
> + pci_save_state(pdev);
>
> - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + del_timer_sync(&hw->idle_timer);
It would seem smarter to put the timer removal before pci-save-state.
> + for (i = 0; i < hw->ports; i++) {
> struct net_device *dev = hw->dev[i];
>
> if (dev) {
> @@ -3441,8 +3448,17 @@ static int sky2_suspend(struct pci_dev *
> }
> }
>
> - pci_save_state(pdev);
> - return sky2_set_power_state(hw, pci_choose_state(pdev, state));
> + imask = sky2_read32(hw, B0_IMSK);
> + sky2_write32(hw, B0_IMSK, 0);
> + synchronize_irq(hw->pdev->irq);
This seems "obviously racy" to me.
> + err = sky2_set_power_state(hw, pci_choose_state(pdev, state));
> + if (err) {
> + sky2_write32(hw, B0_IMSK, imask);
> + sky2_idle_start(hw);
> + }
> +
> + return err;
> }
>
> static int sky2_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> @@ -3460,7 +3476,7 @@ static int sky2_resume(struct pci_dev *p
> if (err)
> goto out;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < hw->ports; i++) {
> struct net_device *dev = hw->dev[i];
> if (dev && netif_running(dev)) {
> netif_device_attach(dev);
> @@ -3473,7 +3489,10 @@ static int sky2_resume(struct pci_dev *p
> }
> }
> }
> -out:
> +
> + sky2_idle_start(hw);
> +
> + out:
> return err;
> }
> #endif
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-13 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606102234110.5498@g5.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <448C0F04.9070406@osdl.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606121032430.5498@g5.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606121107460.5498@g5.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606121117550.5498@g5.osdl.org>
[not found] ` <20060612222740.GB5783@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606121537420.5498@g5.osdl.org>
2006-06-13 4:45 ` [PATCH] sky2: suspend / resume fix Stephen Hemminger
2006-06-13 5:00 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=448E4674.8010605@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).