From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.17: networking bug??
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:58:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <448EEE9D.10105@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <448ED9B3.8050506@rtr.ca>
..
> The site www.everymac.com is still not browseable until
> setting /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_window_scaling===0.
>
> There's one other difference I see in the tcpdump traces.
> The first packets from each trace below show different
> values for "wscale". The old (working) kernels use "wscale 2",
> whereas 2.6.17 uses "wscale 6". In both cases, the value
> seen in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_adv_win_scale is 2.
Okay. More progress here. The calculation of the "wscale" values
is based on the "tcp_rmem" sysctl numbers.
The defaults for these *differ* between 2.6.16.18 and 2.6.17-rc*.
2.6.16: 4096 87380 174760
2.6.17: 4096 87380 2097152
If I change the tcp_rmem setting on 2.6.17 to match the old value,
then the website www.everymac.com becomes accessible again:
echo 4096 87380 174760 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rmem
Looking at diffs between 2.6.16 and 2.6.17, I see a big rework
of the tcp_rmem code in linux/net/ipv4/tcp.c
Looks like something got broken there, or possibly the wscale
calculations have a bug that is only triggered by the new rmem values ??
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-13 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <448EC6F3.3060002@rtr.ca>
[not found] ` <448ECB09.3010308@rtr.ca>
2006-06-13 15:00 ` 2.6.17: networking bug?? Mark Lord
2006-06-13 15:28 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 16:58 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2006-06-13 17:22 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 17:39 ` John Heffner
2006-06-13 17:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-13 18:26 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 19:08 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 21:26 ` David Miller
2006-06-13 21:49 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 22:12 ` Rick Jones
2006-06-13 22:23 ` David Miller
2006-06-13 22:40 ` Rick Jones
2006-06-13 23:01 ` David Miller
2006-06-14 1:25 ` John Heffner
2006-06-13 23:22 ` Matt Mackall
2006-06-19 7:07 ` Helge Hafting
2006-06-14 5:18 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-14 8:09 ` Daniel Drake
2006-06-13 18:28 ` John Heffner
2006-06-13 20:45 ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-13 22:09 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-13 22:23 ` David Miller
2006-07-02 17:39 ` Jan Knutar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=448EEE9D.10105@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).