From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: 2.6.17: networking bug??
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:26:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <448F0344.9000008@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606131048550.5498@g5.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2006, John Heffner wrote:
>> The best thing you can do is try to find this broken box and inform its owner
>> that it needs to be fixed. (If you can find out what it is, I'd be interested
>> to know.) In the meantime, disabling window scaling will work around the
>> problem for you.
>
> Well, arguably, we shouldn't necessarily have defaults that use window
> scaling, or we should have ways to recognize automatically when it
> doesn't work (which may not be possible).
>
> It's not like there aren't broken boxes out there, and it might be better
> to make the default buffer sizes just be low enough that window scaling
> simply isn't an issue.
>
> I suspect that the people who really want/need window scaling know about
> it, and could be assumed to know enough to raise their limits, no?
Agreed. It's taken me over a month here to realize that the particular
webserver in question (www.everymac.com) wasn't "dead", but merely being
blocked by my 2.6.17 kernel. All was fine with 2.6.16, as I discovered today.
I wonder how many other "dead sites" there are out there,
that will be shut off from people when they "upgrade" to 2.6.17 ?
I'm a kernel hacker. Most users of 2.6.17 will not be.
The default should be something that works "by default".
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-13 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <448EC6F3.3060002@rtr.ca>
[not found] ` <448ECB09.3010308@rtr.ca>
2006-06-13 15:00 ` 2.6.17: networking bug?? Mark Lord
2006-06-13 15:28 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 16:58 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 17:22 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 17:39 ` John Heffner
2006-06-13 17:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-06-13 18:26 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2006-06-13 19:08 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 21:26 ` David Miller
2006-06-13 21:49 ` Mark Lord
2006-06-13 22:12 ` Rick Jones
2006-06-13 22:23 ` David Miller
2006-06-13 22:40 ` Rick Jones
2006-06-13 23:01 ` David Miller
2006-06-14 1:25 ` John Heffner
2006-06-13 23:22 ` Matt Mackall
2006-06-19 7:07 ` Helge Hafting
2006-06-14 5:18 ` Andi Kleen
2006-06-14 8:09 ` Daniel Drake
2006-06-13 18:28 ` John Heffner
2006-06-13 20:45 ` Barry K. Nathan
2006-06-13 22:09 ` Chase Venters
2006-06-13 22:23 ` David Miller
2006-07-02 17:39 ` Jan Knutar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=448F0344.9000008@rtr.ca \
--to=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).