From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Tokarev Subject: Re: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6197 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 01:38:18 +0400 Message-ID: <448F304A.2020808@tls.msk.ru> References: <20060611055132.2930b95f.akpm@osdl.org> <448EE065.9060207@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from hobbit.corpit.ru ([81.13.94.6]:45399 "EHLO hobbit.corpit.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932327AbWFMViX (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:38:23 -0400 To: Patrick McHardy In-Reply-To: <448EE065.9060207@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy wrote: [] > He patched his kernel with the IMQ device, which is known to cause all > kinds of weird problems. Wich problems? Known to whom? I was considering using imq for our needs (not done yet), and from the FAQ at http://www.linuximq.net/faq.html (item #3, "Is it stable?") it seems there's no problems except of gre tunnels and locally generated traffic... Googling for "imq linux problem" shows usual pile of various user support questions (how to configure.. what did I do wrong.. etc), but nothing relevant. So... I'm curious whenever the claim on linuximq.net site about the stability is true, or there in fact are some real issue... Thanks. /mjt