From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/2] in-kernel sockets API
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:30:27 -0700
Message-ID: <448F3C83.9080606@google.com>
References: <1150156562.19929.32.camel@w-sridhar2.beaverton.ibm.com> <20060613140716.6af45bec@localhost.localdomain> <20060613052215.B27858@openss7.org> <448F2A49.5020809@google.com> <20060613154031.A6276@openss7.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606131655580.4856@turbotaz.ourhouse>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Brian F. G. Bidulock" <bidulock@openss7.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.45.12]:39314 "EHLO
	smtp-out.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932324AbWFMWal
	(ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:30:41 -0400
To: Chase Venters <chase.venters@clientec.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606131655580.4856@turbotaz.ourhouse>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Chase Venters wrote:
> can you name some non-GPL non-proprietary modules we should be concerned
> about?

You probably meant "non-GPL-compatible non-proprietary".  If so, then by
definition there are none.

Regards,

Daniel