From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: 2.6.17: networking bug?? Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:40:53 -0700 Message-ID: <448F3EF5.50701@hp.com> References: <448F0D4B.30201@rtr.ca> <20060613.142603.48825062.davem@davemloft.net> <448F32E1.8080002@rtr.ca> <20060613.152301.26928146.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lkml@rtr.ca, jheffner@psc.edu, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from palrel11.hp.com ([156.153.255.246]:21996 "EHLO palrel11.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932318AbWFMWk5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2006 18:40:57 -0400 To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060613.152301.26928146.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > One final word about window sizes. If you have a connection whose > bandwidth-delay-product needs an N byte buffer to fill, you actually > have to have an "N * 2" sized buffer available in order for fast > retransmit to work. Is that as important in the presence of SACK? rick jones