From: Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz>
To: Russell Stuart <russell-tcatm@stuart.id.au>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@cyberus.ca>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@comx.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Runtime configuration of HTB's HYSTERESIS option
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:49:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44912D27.4010503@cdi.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1150362059.5578.13.camel@ras.pc.brisbane.lube>
Russell Stuart wrote:
> The HTB qdisc has a compile time option, HTB_HYSTERESIS,
> that trades accuracy of traffic classification for CPU
> time. These patches change hysteresis to be a runtime
> option under the control of "tc".
>
> The effects of HYSTERESIS on HTB's accuracy are significant
> (see chapter 7, section 7.3.1, pp 69-70 in Jesper Brouer's
> thesis: http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/thesis/ ), whereas
> HTB's CPU usage on modern machines using broadband links
> is minimal. Currently HYSTERESIS is on by default, and
> requires a kernel re-compile to change. Altering it to
> be a runtime option will make life easier for the bulk of
> its users.
At time of HTB implementation I needed to reach 100MBit speed on
relatively slow box. The hysteresis was a way. On other side I used
hand-made TSC based measure tool to compute exact (15%) performance
gain. Today I'd measure it using oprofile.
When rethinking it again I'd suggest to re-measure real performance
impact for both flat and deep class hierarchy and consider switching the
hysteresis off by default (or even to remove the code if the gain is
negligible). If it is the case then it is the cleanest solution IMHO.
On other side I see no problem with attached patches. Have you tested
patched kernel with old "tc" tool ?
thanks for your effort,
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-15 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-15 9:00 [PATCH 0/2] Runtime configuration of HTB's HYSTERESIS option Russell Stuart
2006-06-15 9:49 ` Martin Devera [this message]
2006-06-20 23:13 ` [LARTC] " Russell Stuart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44912D27.4010503@cdi.cz \
--to=devik@cdi.cz \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=hawk@comx.dk \
--cc=lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=russell-tcatm@stuart.id.au \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).