public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15] ice: dpll: fix rclk pin state get and misplaced header macros
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 10:35:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4491b157-210d-41ec-8679-6932b3749b90@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97261b38-3251-4b13-a106-67e4b4ecc8c8@intel.com>

On 5/5/26 12:39 AM, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On 4/30/2026 11:37 PM, Jacob Keller wrote:
>> From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
>>
>> Fix two issues introduced in commit ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support
>> E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery"):
>>
>> * The refactoring of ice_dpll_rclk_state_on_pin_get() to use
>>    ice_dpll_pin_get_parent_idx() omitted the base_rclk_idx adjustment
>>    that was correctly added in the ice_dpll_rclk_state_on_pin_set() path.
>>    This breaks E810 devices where base_rclk_idx is non-zero, causing
>>    the wrong hardware index to be used for pin state lookup and incorrect
>>    recovered clock state to be reported via the DPLL subsystem. E825C is
>>    unaffected as its base_rclk_idx is 0.
>>
>> * Add bounds check against ICE_DPLL_RCLK_NUM_MAX on hw_idx after the
>>    base_rclk_idx subtraction in both ice_dpll_rclk_state_on_pin_{get,set}()
>>    to prevent out-of-bounds access on the pin state array.
>>
>> * The CGU register definitions (ICE_CGU_R10, ICE_CGU_R11 and related field
>>    masks) were placed after the #endif of the _ICE_DPLL_H_ include guard,
>>    leaving them unprotected. Move them inside the guard.
>>
>> Fixes: ad1df4f2d591 ("ice: dpll: Support E825-C SyncE and dynamic pin discovery")
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
>> ---
> Ivan,
> 
> Unless you have any objections I will go ahead and rebase this ontop of
> net and submit it in my next round of fixes. I might split the changes
> to have the CGU register definitions change in a separate patch since it
> conceptually isn't the same issue as the other two.
> 
No objections at all! :-)... Please go ahead, rebase and submit.

Thank you.

Ivan


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-05  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-01  6:37 [PATCH net-next 00/15] Intel Wired LAN Updates 2024-04-30 (ixgbe, i40e, ice) Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] ixgbe: E610: add discovering EEE capability Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] ixgbe: E610: update EEE supported speeds Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] ixgbe: E610: use new version of 0x601 ACI command buffer Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] ixgbe: E610: update ACI command structs with EEE fields Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] ixgbe: move EEE config validation out of ixgbe_set_eee() Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] ixgbe: E610: add EEE support Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] ixgbe: E610: add ACI dynamic debug Jacob Keller
2026-05-03  2:06   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-04 22:33     ` Jacob Keller
2026-05-05  6:11       ` Kwapulinski, Piotr
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] ixgbe: E610: remove redundant assignment Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] ixgbe: fix unaligned u32 access in ixgbe_update_flash_X550() Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] i40e: only timestamp PTP event packets Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] ice: mention fw_activate action along with devlink reload Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] ice: access @pp through netmem_desc instead of page Jacob Keller
2026-05-04  9:48   ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 13/15] ice: dpll: Fix compilation warning Jacob Keller
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] ice: dpll: fix rclk pin state get and misplaced header macros Jacob Keller
2026-05-03  2:09   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-04 18:38     ` Keller, Jacob E
2026-05-05  8:33       ` Ivan Vecera
2026-05-04 22:39   ` Jacob Keller
2026-05-05  8:35     ` Ivan Vecera [this message]
2026-05-01  6:37 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] ice: add support for unmanaged DPLL on E830 NIC Jacob Keller
2026-05-03  2:09   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-03  2:20 ` [PATCH net-next 00/15] Intel Wired LAN Updates 2024-04-30 (ixgbe, i40e, ice) patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4491b157-210d-41ec-8679-6932b3749b90@redhat.com \
    --to=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox