From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Ron Mercer <ron.mercer@qlogic.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-driver@qlogic.com,
Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Subject: Re: New Qlogic qla3xxx NIC Driver v2.02.00k34 for upstream inclusion
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:22:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <449B2621.7080607@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0BB3E5E7462EEA4295BC02D49691DC0717688F@AVEXCH1.qlogic.org>
Ron Mercer wrote:
> ftp://ftp.qlogic.com/outgoing/linux/network/upstream/2.02.00k34/qla3xxxp
> atch1-v2.02.00-k34.txt
Your mailer breaks this into two lines, which is a pain.
Comments on this updated version:
1) [semi-major] Infinite loop in ql_sem_spinlock(), if hardware is
faulty or been unplugged.
2) Similarly, other rare hardware conditions could cause
ql_sem_spinlock() to wait for a very, very long time.
3) [minor] PCI_POSTING() macro seems a bit ugly to me. No good
suggestions on better paths... maybe at least make it a static inline,
to enable better type checking.
4) [minor] ql_wait_for_drvr_lock() should use ssleep() rather than msleep()
5) What is the point of using the hardware semaphore? Is a firmware
competing with the device driver somehow, and its activities require
synchronization with the OS driver?
6) [major] The locking model is wrong for the API. The very low level
functions ql_read_common_reg() and ql_write_common_reg() take a spinlock
inside their guts, which is quite expensive when you read the rest of
the code:
> + /* Clock in a zero, then do the start bit */
> + ql_write_common_reg(qdev, &port_regs->CommonRegs.serialPortInterfaceReg,+ ISP_NVRAM_MASK | qdev->eeprom_cmd_data |
> + AUBURN_EEPROM_DO_1);
> + ql_write_common_reg(qdev, &port_regs->CommonRegs.serialPortInterfaceReg,+ ISP_NVRAM_MASK | qdev->
> + eeprom_cmd_data | AUBURN_EEPROM_DO_1 |
> + AUBURN_EEPROM_CLK_RISE);
> + ql_write_common_reg(qdev, &port_regs->CommonRegs.serialPortInterfaceReg,+ ISP_NVRAM_MASK | qdev->
> + eeprom_cmd_data | AUBURN_EEPROM_DO_1 |
> + AUBURN_EEPROM_CLK_FALL);
The above quoted code just acquired and released the spinlock three
times, an operation that could have _obviously_ been reduced to a single
lock acquire + release. In fact, the situation is worse than it sounds,
because there were a bunch more ql_write_common_reg() calls in the
function I quoted from.
Thus, this locking is _too_ low-level, and it _prevents_ more
intelligent use of spinlocks, e.g.
spin_lock_foo()
write reg
write reg
read reg
spin_unlock_foo()
I would venture to say that this locking model is largely useless in
practice. A better locking scheme is not only far more optimal, it
would also be more _provable_ (such as with Ingo's lock validator).
7) Severe lack of comments.
8) [readability] ql_link_state_machine() suffers from overzealous
indentation, which was caused by the functions large size. At the very
least, I would suggest breaking out the "/* configure the MAC */"
sequence into a separate function.
9) [minor] "N/A" appears to be an inaccurate value for fw_version in
ql_get_drvinfo()
10) [semi-major] More over-locking. You take the TX spinlock for
_every_ TX, in ql_process_mac_tx_intr() [which only processes a single
TX completion] -> ql_free_txbuf().
11) General comment: Have you noticed that all hot path operations save
for ->hard_start_xmit() occur entirely inside adapter_lock ?
12) For new drivers, we see additional work and little value for
maintained #ifdef'd NAPI and non-NAPI code paths. Just pick the best
one (and justify that decision with sound technical rationale).
13) The tx_lock appears to offer no value outside of the normal locking.
14) Surely there is a better way to down the adapter than masking the
interrupts and resetting the adapter? If this is ever used in non-MSI
situations (common in Linux today), there is the possibility of
screaming interrupts, in shared-interrupt situations.
15) I wonder if SA_SHIRQ needs to be set, for MSI?
16) [minor] several other places where ssleep() could be used
17) the following tests in ql3xxx_remove() should be eliminated, as they
are impossible:
+ if (ndev == NULL)
+ if (qdev == NULL) {
18) [minor] standard practice is to print the driver name and version in
pci_driver::probe(), on the first call to that function. Your driver
acts differently from others, by printing it in ql3xxx_init_module()
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-22 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-22 22:37 New Qlogic qla3xxx NIC Driver v2.02.00k34 for upstream inclusion Ron Mercer
2006-06-22 23:22 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2006-06-23 0:05 ` Roland Dreier
2006-06-23 1:20 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-23 16:36 Ron Mercer
2006-06-23 21:23 Ron Mercer
2006-06-23 21:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-23 22:08 Ron Mercer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=449B2621.7080607@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-driver@qlogic.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
--cc=ron.mercer@qlogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).