From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: e1000 fails to load sometimes: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:57:29 -0700 Message-ID: <44B6C1C9.4000201@goop.org> References: <44B69545.8000507@intel.com> <44B6B14A.3020001@goop.org> <44B6B43B.6000005@intel.com> <44B6B5FB.6070400@goop.org> <44B6BA16.5040902@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: profilek@users.sourceforge.net, squat@users.sourceforge.net, NetDev , Jesse Brandeburg , "Ronciak, John" Return-path: Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:7339 "EHLO mail.goop.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030422AbWGMV5V (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:57:21 -0400 To: Auke Kok In-Reply-To: <44B6BA16.5040902@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Auke Kok wrote: > x60 bios upgrade 1.06 is here: (found by typing "x60 bios" in the > search bar on the same website) > > http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/license.do?filename=mobiles/7buj04uc.iso > > > unfortunately the changelog for this BIOS upgrade doesn't tell us much > if the DSPD feature was affected or not. I also have not tried this > one either. I've been running 1.06 for a while, and I haven't seen this problem in a while, but I can't say if those two observations are correlated. J