From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: Alternate to Ixia's ANVL test harness for tcp compliance.
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:04:34 -0400
Message-ID: <44BFE1D2.8060004@garzik.org>
References: <1153424967.8114.450.camel@piet2.bluelane.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	piet at work <piet@work.piet.net>,
	Rajneesh Saini <rksaini@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:33460 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030372AbWGTUFa (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 20 Jul 2006 16:05:30 -0400
To: piet@bluelane.com
In-Reply-To: <1153424967.8114.450.camel@piet2.bluelane.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Piet Delaney wrote:
> Do any of you use tools other than ANVL for RFC compliance while
> hacking to the tcp code?
> 
> In the unlikely event that there isn't an alternate; is there any
> interest in a netdev group effort to motivate Ixia to porting their C 
> sharp code to linux. I get the feeling that come of their developers
> would like to port the code to linux.


Linux is the most RFC-compliant net stack in the world...  if they don't 
want to support Linux, it's their loss.  :)

	Jeff