From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [3/4] kevent: AIO, aio_sendfile() implementation. Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 17:14:34 +0300 Message-ID: <44C778CA.1010404@argo.co.il> References: <20060726.031247.98341392.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hch@infradead.org, johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, drepper@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from gateway.argo.co.il ([194.90.79.130]:32531 "EHLO argo2k.argo.co.il") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750728AbWGZOOi (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:14:38 -0400 To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060726.031247.98341392.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > > From: Christoph Hellwig > Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:04:31 +0100 > > > And to be honest, I don't think adding all this code is acceptable > > if it can't replace the existing aio code while keeping the > > interface. So while you interface looks pretty sane the > > implementation needs a lot of work still :) > > Networking and disk AIO have significantly different needs. > Surely, there needs to be a unified polling interface to support single threaded designs. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function