Re: IBM (Lenovo) T60: e1000 driver high latency

[Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>]

Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>    [ resend because .config and the used kernel version was missing ]
> 
> Linux Kernel Version: Linus Vanilla Tree; .config attached.
> 
> I recently aquired a Lenovo (IBM) T60 with a e1000 network card. I
> experience high latency with this networkcard: Pings last upto 1 second
> where the ping should be around 25 ms. I googled a bit and found the
> following:
> 
> - Enable NAPI, which didn't worked for me.
> 
>         64 bytes from 192.168.0.223: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=1004 ms
>         64 bytes from 192.168.0.223: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=0.444 ms
>         64 bytes from 192.168.0.223: icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=1006 ms
>         64 bytes from 192.168.0.223: icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=0.739 ms

Someone reported this problem on the e1000 bug tracker at e1000.sf.net.

He also reported that the behaviour goes away completely if he disables the 
in-kernel irq balancer:

: If I disable in kernel config Irq Balancing pings are
: much better but not the best  :-)
:
: 64 bytes from 192.168.3.74: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=12.7 ms
: 64 bytes from 192.168.3.74: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=10.0 ms
: 64 bytes from 192.168.3.74: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=7.3 ms
: 64 bytes from 192.168.3.74: icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=4.5 ms

that's a large difference from >> 1000ms, and I cannot suspect otherwise that 
the kernel irqbalance is wreaking havoc in your system, trying to swap the 
entire context between each core (t60 is a core duo) every second or so.

I've never believed much in the kernel irq balancer, the userspace daemon 
written by Arjan van der Ven just does a much better job, so can you try to 
disable the kernel irqbalancer?

 > CONFIG_IRQBALANCE=y

turn that off ;)


Cheers,

Auke