From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oumer Teyeb Subject: Re: Linux TCP in the presence of delays or drops... Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 08:44:58 +0200 Message-ID: <44CEF86A.8070401@kom.aau.dk> References: <44CD0D58.7050207@kom.aau.dk> <44CE42A8.7090305@kom.aau.dk> <20060731.131249.21928475.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from zaz.kom.auc.dk ([130.225.51.10]:53703 "EHLO zaz.kom.auc.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161208AbWHAGpY (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2006 02:45:24 -0400 To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060731.131249.21928475.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi David, My intention when I wrote the second mail was just to provide some more examples that further elaborate my first question. But as you noticed, I couldnt resist the temptation to slip in a couple of new questions on the new post :-(...sorry and will take your advice into consideration on my future postings. Thanks for the tip!! Regards, Oumer David Miller wrote: >From: Oumer Teyeb >Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:49:28 +0200 > > > >>it would be so great if some of you could spare a few minutes and take a >>look at the traces I provided.....see below for the original postng... >> >> > >If people are too backlogged and busy to reply to your original >posting, you will only ensure that it will take even longer by >bombarding the list with even more information and questions on >top of your original large query. > >Just be patient. > >