From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] pcnet32: break in 2.6.18-rc1 identified (corrected) Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 00:01:34 -0400 Message-ID: <44D95E1E.9010403@garzik.org> References: <20060804162628.GA7229@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: murrayma@citi.umich.edu, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:59547 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030346AbWHIEBk (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 00:01:40 -0400 To: Don Fry In-Reply-To: <20060804162628.GA7229@us.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Don Fry wrote: > I noticed this morning that I had the polarity wrong in my patch > yesterday for older chips in the pcnet32_suspend routine. Here is the > correct patch to test. > >> A change I made for 2.6.17 and another for 2.6.18 do not work on older >> pcnet32 chips which I do not have access to. Please test this patch if >> you have access to a 79C970, 79C974, or 79C965 (VLB) version of the >> pcnet32 and let me know if it solves any problems. I have tested with a >> 79C970A, 79C971, 79C972, 79C973, 79C975, 79C976, and 79C978 and the >> changes work as expected. Did testing succeed? signed-off-by? Jeff