From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ville Nuorvala Subject: Re: [PATCH][IPV6]: Make sure fib6_rule_lookup doesn't return NULL Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:45:48 +0300 Message-ID: <44D9BCDC.2070107@tcs.hut.fi> References: <20060808221651.GS14627@postel.suug.ch> <20060808.164345.91207648.davem@davemloft.net> <44D98133.8040707@tcs.hut.fi> <20060808.233442.41636358.davem@davemloft.net> <44D99E73.1060305@tcs.hut.fi> <20060809092311.GU14627@postel.suug.ch> <44D9ADFB.90200@tcs.hut.fi> <20060809094818.GW14627@postel.suug.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from neon.tcs.hut.fi ([130.233.215.20]:20488 "EHLO neon.tcs.hut.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030673AbWHIKpu (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Aug 2006 06:45:50 -0400 To: Thomas Graf In-Reply-To: <20060809094818.GW14627@postel.suug.ch> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Thomas Graf wrote: > * Ville Nuorvala 2006-08-09 12:42 >> Ok, it might require quite big changes to the existing code, but if >> someone is willing to take a look at it I wouldn't be against it :-) > > I'll provide a patch soon. Great, but just out of curiosity: about when is soon? My source address routing changes are likely to cause some conflicts with your code, so I'm just trying to plan ahead so I don't need to spend half an eternity merging the afore mentioned conflicts. Regards, Ville