From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Christophe Devriese <Christophe.Devriese@eurid.eu>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Stackable devices.
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 11:43:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44DE216E.4020609@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608091557.09249.Christophe.Devriese@eurid.eu>
Christophe Devriese wrote:
> It would however be considerable effort to do this. Is this going to end up
> unapplied like my last patch, or ?
I don't get to make this decision..and when I ask such questions...they
are usually ignored unless I also post a working patch....
I think you could start with just supporting bridging without too
much code.
Ben
>
> Regards,
>
> Christophe
>
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 18:36, you wrote:
>
>>Christophe Devriese wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 10:50:08AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>
>>>>Currently, the bridge hook logic is something like:
>>>>
>>>>if (bridge-consumed-pkt) {
>>>> return
>>>>}
>>>>
>>>>// drop through to other layers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>There are several other hooks I'd like to see added (pktgen receive
>>>>processing,
>>>>mac-vlans, etc). Each of these hooks are logically similar to the bridge
>>>>hook,
>>>>ie if it consumes the pkt, return, else, drop through to the next hook
>>>>untill
>>>>we get to the regular protocol processing logic.
>>>>
>>>>I would like to be able to chain layer-2 handlers, such as bridge,
>>>>mac-vlan, pktgen such that if one consumed, you break out of the
>>>>handling, else, you try the next handler. The handlers can be
>>>>dynamically registered and inserted
>>>>in any order, controllable by user-space and/or module load/unload.
>>>>
>>>>For many of the handlers, the logic will re-insert the packet by
>>>>re-calling the
>>>>netif-rx logic, so there would need to be some protection to keep loops
>>>>from occurring that would recurse too much and overflow the stack.
>>>
>>>I'm also a big fan of a generalized system like this. It would need to
>>>catch both the vlan accelerated path and the normal path.
>>
>>Well, it isn't actually needed for VLANs since VLAN's hook is a protocol
>>handler....
>>
>>Ben
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-12 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-28 9:44 PATCH Fix bonding active-backup behavior for VLAN interfaces Christophe Devriese
2006-07-28 16:01 ` Ben Greear
2006-07-28 21:50 ` Christophe Devriese
2006-07-28 21:55 ` Ben Greear
2006-07-28 22:15 ` Christophe Devriese
[not found] ` <20060728221455.GA25610@walrus.eth1.org>
[not found] ` <44CA8AF1.3020408@candelatech.com>
2006-07-28 22:58 ` Christophe Devriese
2006-07-28 22:55 ` David Miller
2006-07-28 23:14 ` Ben Greear
2006-07-31 3:50 ` David Miller
2006-07-31 8:15 ` Christophe Devriese
2006-07-31 12:30 ` Linville's L2 rant... -- " John W. Linville
2006-07-31 16:48 ` Christophe Devriese
2006-08-01 1:39 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2006-08-01 12:08 ` John W. Linville
2006-08-01 12:33 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2006-08-01 16:10 ` Ben Greear
2006-08-01 16:52 ` John W. Linville
2006-08-01 17:04 ` Ben Greear
2006-08-01 19:47 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2006-08-01 16:48 ` John W. Linville
2006-08-01 16:17 ` Ben Greear
2006-08-01 17:03 ` John W. Linville
2006-08-01 17:21 ` Ben Greear
2006-08-02 9:02 ` Christophe Devriese
2006-08-02 17:37 ` Stackable devices Stephen Hemminger
2006-08-02 17:50 ` Ben Greear
2006-08-08 12:03 ` Christophe Devriese
2006-08-08 16:36 ` Ben Greear
2006-08-09 13:57 ` Christophe Devriese
2006-08-12 18:43 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2006-08-12 19:29 ` Ben Greear
2006-08-02 20:58 ` PATCH Fix bonding active-backup behavior for VLAN interfaces David Miller
2006-08-03 9:18 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-08-10 18:18 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-08-11 6:45 ` David Miller
2006-08-11 8:50 ` Christophe Devriese
2006-08-11 8:53 ` David Miller
2006-08-14 8:16 ` Christophe Devriese
2006-08-14 8:47 ` David Miller
2006-08-14 8:47 ` David Miller
2006-08-03 13:34 ` Christophe Devriese
2006-08-04 1:01 ` Jay Vosburgh
2006-08-15 0:09 ` David Miller
2006-08-15 22:18 ` Jay Vosburgh
2006-08-15 22:27 ` David Miller
2006-08-16 19:30 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2006-08-20 19:41 ` Christophe Devriese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44DE216E.4020609@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=Christophe.Devriese@eurid.eu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).