Re: [PATCH] move skb->dev assignment into netdev_alloc_skb

[Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>]

Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Aug 2006, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>>> Since the e1000 change is non-trivial I'm not going to bypass
>>>> the driver author on it, sorry.
>>>>
>>>> What I did do was put the netdev_alloc_skb() change into my
>>>> tree, and since I'm co-author of the tg3 driver I'll apply
>>>> that bit too.
>>>>
>>>> The e1000 bit will need to go through the e1000 maintainers.
>>> Thank you, I'll take a look at this tomorrow, as I need to digest the
>>> patch in context.
>> Did you get a chance to look at it?  For your conveniance here's just
>> the e1000 bits, without the hunks Dave has commited already:
>>
> 
> I'm okay with this change.  Auke will shortly be submitting a patch set 
> for 2.6.19 and it should include this.

Great, I was already waiting for this change to drip in but hadn't checked for 
it. I've queued it and it will be included in this weeks' patch series git pull 
request.

Cheers,

Auke


> Thanks for the feedback Christoph!
> 
> Jesse
> 
> for reference this is the patch, but like i said auke will enqueue it in 
> GIT and send it to Jeff for inclusion.
> 
> e1000: clean up skb allocation code, patch submitted by Christoph
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Acked-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> 
> ---
> 
>  drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c |   19 +++++++------------
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index 627f224..66c0325 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static char e1000_driver_string[] = "Int
>  #else
>  #define DRIVERNAPI "-NAPI"
>  #endif
> -#define DRV_VERSION "7.1.9-k4"DRIVERNAPI
> +#define DRV_VERSION "7.1.9-k6"DRIVERNAPI
>  char e1000_driver_version[] = DRV_VERSION;
>  static char e1000_copyright[] = "Copyright (c) 1999-2006 Intel Corporation.";
>  
> @@ -3711,7 +3711,6 @@ e1000_clean_rx_irq(struct e1000_adapter 
>  			    netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
>  			if (new_skb) {
>  				skb_reserve(new_skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
> -				new_skb->dev = netdev;
>  				memcpy(new_skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN,
>  				       skb->data - NET_IP_ALIGN,
>  				       length + NET_IP_ALIGN);
> @@ -3978,13 +3977,13 @@ e1000_alloc_rx_buffers(struct e1000_adap
>  	buffer_info = &rx_ring->buffer_info[i];
>  
>  	while (cleaned_count--) {
> -		if (!(skb = buffer_info->skb))
> -			skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, bufsz);
> -		else {
> +		skb = buffer_info->skb;
> +		if (skb) {
>  			skb_trim(skb, 0);
>  			goto map_skb;
>  		}
>  
> +		skb = netdev_alloc_skb(netdev, bufsz);
>  		if (unlikely(!skb)) {
>  			/* Better luck next round */
>  			adapter->alloc_rx_buff_failed++;
> @@ -4009,10 +4008,10 @@ e1000_alloc_rx_buffers(struct e1000_adap
>  				dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>  				dev_kfree_skb(oldskb);
>  				break; /* while !buffer_info->skb */
> -			} else {
> -				/* Use new allocation */
> -				dev_kfree_skb(oldskb);
>  			}
> +
> +			/* Use new allocation */
> +			dev_kfree_skb(oldskb);
>  		}
>  		/* Make buffer alignment 2 beyond a 16 byte boundary
>  		 * this will result in a 16 byte aligned IP header after
> @@ -4020,8 +4019,6 @@ e1000_alloc_rx_buffers(struct e1000_adap
>  		 */
>  		skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
>  
> -		skb->dev = netdev;
> -
>  		buffer_info->skb = skb;
>  		buffer_info->length = adapter->rx_buffer_len;
>  map_skb:
> @@ -4135,8 +4132,6 @@ e1000_alloc_rx_buffers_ps(struct e1000_a
>  		 */
>  		skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
>  
> -		skb->dev = netdev;
> -
>  		buffer_info->skb = skb;
>  		buffer_info->length = adapter->rx_ps_bsize0;
>  		buffer_info->dma = pci_map_single(pdev, skb->data,