From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Drake Subject: Reasons behind HAVE_TX_TIMEOUT Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:55:40 +0100 Message-ID: <44E59CAC.9010300@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.48]:64198 "EHLO mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751356AbWHRKoh (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Aug 2006 06:44:37 -0400 Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060818104436.KFQS27023.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:44:36 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [86.14.216.162]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060818104436.LVJU11710.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.0.2]> for ; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 11:44:36 +0100 To: Netdev list Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi, Just curious, why do we have an unconditional #define in netdevice.h for HAVE_TX_TIMEOUT, and some drivers (e.g. xirc2ps_cs) using it conditionally as if it might be disabled on some builds? There are other similar defines in netdevice.h too. Thanks, Daniel