From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] IP100A, add end of pci id table
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:09:37 -0400
Message-ID: <44E59FF1.6090703@pobox.com>
References: <1155841247.4532.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <44E480FA.70806@pobox.com> <02d101c6c28a$7c19d160$4964a8c0@icplus.com.tw>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:48855 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932199AbWHRLJl (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:09:41 -0400
To: Jesse Huang <jesse@icplus.com.tw>
In-Reply-To: <02d101c6c28a$7c19d160$4964a8c0@icplus.com.tw>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Jesse Huang wrote:
> Hi Jeff:
> 
>     Sorry for that. I will remove those. Am I need to resent all of those
> patch or send all in one patch?

Normally, when I merged a patch, you will receive a one-word reply 
"applied" or "merged".  Or for a series of patches, "applies patches 1-6".

For this series of patches, you will need to resend the entire patchset, 
modified with the comments so far.

It is quite normal for some patchsets to undergo several iterations 
before being merged, when engineering review highlights issues.

Thanks and regards,

	Jeff