netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Bieringer <pb@bieringer.de>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉" <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>,
	usagi-users@linux-ipv6.org,
	"YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明" <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Subject: (usagi-users 03690) Re: Bug in order of multiple IPv6 addresses per interface? Newest added one is preferred in difference to IPv4
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:36:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44E9A8BA.8010904@bieringer.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <y7vu046b8we.wl%jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>

JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 schrieb:
>>>>>> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:47:36 +0200, 
>>>>>> Peter Bieringer <pb@bieringer.de> said:
> 
>>> I do not favor changing this so far.
> 
>> Hmm, would it be possible to implement a primary flag in the future?
> 
>> BTW: Does anyone know about the behavior of *BSD for this issue?
> 
> As far as I know, BSD variants don't have the notion of *explicit*
> 'first/primary' or 'secondary' address.  But if your main concern is
> to prefer particular addresses as the source address of outgoing
> packets, you'd be able to achieve the goal by configuring appropriate
> policy table entries (per RFC3484).

Hmm, can I do this on Linux, too for preferring a source address (out of
configured addresses from the *same subnet*)?

I only found:
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/linux-rfc3484.html
But this is more related to destination addresses.

Thank you very much.

	Peter
-- 
Dr. Peter Bieringer                     http://www.bieringer.de/pb/
GPG/PGP Key 0x958F422D                       mailto:pb@bieringer.de
Deep Space 6 Co-Founder and Core Member  http://www.deepspace6.net/
OpenBC                    http://www.openbc.com/hp/Peter_Bieringer/
Personal invitation to OpenBC  http://www.openbc.com/go/invita/3889

      reply	other threads:[~2006-08-21 12:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-08-21  5:36 Bug in order of multiple IPv6 addresses per interface? Newest added one is preferred in difference to IPv4 Peter Bieringer
2006-08-21 10:42 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2006-08-21 10:47   ` (usagi-users 03687) " Peter Bieringer
2006-08-21 11:55     ` JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
2006-08-21 12:36       ` Peter Bieringer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44E9A8BA.8010904@bieringer.de \
    --to=pb@bieringer.de \
    --cc=jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=usagi-users@linux-ipv6.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).