From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Masahide NAKAMURA Subject: Re: [PATCH 44/44] [XFRM] IPV6: Support Mobile IPv6 extension headers sorting. Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:56:28 +0900 Message-ID: <44EE4ABC.6050604@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20060824.150442.44820672.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <20060823.235404.108743952.davem@davemloft.net> <44ED4FC3.9060005@linux-ipv6.org> <20060824.045850.74749237.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, anttit@tcs.hut.fi, vnuorval@tcs.hut.fi, netdev@vger.kernel.org, usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: Received: from [203.178.140.9] ([203.178.140.9]:28570 "EHLO mail.gomagoma.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932127AbWHYA4H (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:56:07 -0400 To: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060824.045850.74749237.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > From: Masahide NAKAMURA > Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:05:39 +0900 > >> David Miller wrote: >>> In the mean time, I will work on porting my XFRM hashing changes >>> for the current net-2.6.19 tree. >> FYI, your work will not have any conflict with the left of MIPv6 patches >> which I will describe later since they are almost out of XFRM. > > Great. > > I just finished the port and pushed all of that work to net-2.6.19, > can folks please take a look? > > I tested IPSEC as best as I could with XFRM_SUB_POLICY enabled, but I > have no way currently to test sub-policies or MIPV6 cases. OK, I will review it and also start my XFRM test with net-2.6.19 as I've done with my tree. Regards, -- Masahide NAKAMURA