From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kir Kolyshkin Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [RFC] network namespaces Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 19:09:28 +0400 Message-ID: <44FEE4A8.5060007@openvz.org> References: <20060815182029.A1685@castle.nmd.msu.ru> <20060816115313.GC31810@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <44FD7CF0.4030009@fr.ibm.com> <20060905165328.GA17317@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <44FEE0C2.6020205@sw.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Linux Containers , Andrey Savochkin , netdev@vger.kernel.org, sam@vilain.net, alexey@sw.ru Return-path: Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.233.200]:29508 "EHLO relay.sw.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751335AbWIFPKX (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:10:23 -0400 To: devel@openvz.org In-Reply-To: <44FEE0C2.6020205@sw.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Kirill Korotaev wrote: > I think classifying network virtualization by Layer X is not good enough. > OpenVZ has Layer 3 (venet) and Layer 2 (veth) implementations, but > in both cases networking stack inside VE remains fully virtualized. > Let's describe all those (three?) approaches at http://wiki.openvz.org/Containers/Networking Everyone is able to read and contribute to that, and (I hope) we will come to the common understanding. I have started the article, please enlarge.