From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [2.6.19 PATCH 1/7] ehea: interface to network stack Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 11:22:16 -0400 Message-ID: <44FEE7A8.1050904@garzik.org> References: <200609041237.46528.ossthema@de.ibm.com> <20060904201606.GA24386@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <200609042311.21202.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Francois Romieu , Jan-Bernd Themann , netdev , Christoph Raisch , Jan-Bernd Themann , linux-kernel , linux-ppc , Marcus Eder , Thomas Klein Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:32731 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751443AbWIFPWW (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 11:22:22 -0400 To: Arnd Bergmann In-Reply-To: <200609042311.21202.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Am Monday 04 September 2006 22:16 schrieb Francois Romieu: >>> +#include "ehea.h" >>> +#include "ehea_qmr.h" >>> +#include "ehea_phyp.h" >> Afaik none of those is included in this patch nor in my 2.6.18-git tree. > > > They are in 5, 3 and 2, respectively > >> Happy bissect in sight. > > The driver should get merged as a single commit anyway, even > if split diffs are posted for review. Even if it gets merged > like this, bisect will work since the Kconfig option is added > in the final patch. That's impossible, in the form they were submitted...