From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] bonding: Add 10 Gig support Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:05:40 -0400 Message-ID: <44FF2A14.9090109@pobox.com> References: <200609012208.k81M86Zt005275@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <44FEE679.6030201@pobox.com> <44FEFD16.1040308@pobox.com> <20060906122346.1413447f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Mitch Williams , Jay Vosburgh , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bonding-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:64997 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932121AbWIFUFr (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 16:05:47 -0400 To: "Randy.Dunlap" In-Reply-To: <20060906122346.1413447f.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Randy.Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:53:42 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> Mitch Williams wrote: >>> Add 10 Gig support to bonding. >>> >>> Resent due to corrupt patch. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams >>> Acked-by: Jay Vosburgh >> Did you test with git-applymbox first? >> >> It's still corrupt... >> >> >> Applying 'bonding: Add 10 Gig support' >> >> fatal: corrupt patch at line 10 > > The patch applies fine for me (not using that git stuff). > Maybe a tool problem? Linus says git-applymbox is more strict than patch(1). patch(1) intentionally accepts (and attempts to correct) certain types of garbage. Jeff