From: "Wu. JackBB (GSM)" <JackBB_Wu@compal.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com" <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com" <ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com>,
"johannes@sipsolutions.net" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"wen-zhi.huang@mediatek.com" <wen-zhi.huang@mediatek.com>,
"shi-wei.yeh@mediatek.com" <shi-wei.yeh@mediatek.com>,
"Minano.tseng@mediatek.com" <Minano.tseng@mediatek.com>,
"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"horms@kernel.org" <horms@kernel.org>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"skhan@linuxfoundation.org" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Yu. Robert (GSM)" <robert_yu@compal.com>,
"Chang. Jeff (GSM)" <Jeff_Chang@compal.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [External Mail] Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] net: wwan: t9xx: Add control plane transaction layer
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 12:22:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44acb3c30c574ab2b9571502c3a6ad3f@compal.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817223652.3688666-1-kuba@kernel.org>
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026 at 22:36, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> [Severity: Low]
> Should the commit message mention this module split? Before this patch
...
> so the module that binds the hardware and carries the PCI modaliases is
> now mtk_t9xx_pcie.ko, while mtk_t9xx.ko only holds mtk_dev.o and
> mtk_ctrl_plane.o with no driver registration.
Will fix in v7. Will update the commit message to mention the module
split, and update the Kconfig help text to name both mtk_t9xx and
mtk_t9xx_pcie.
> [Severity: Low]
> Does the kernel-doc for mtk_ctrl_exit() match what the function does? The
> comment says "Frees the control plane block associated with @mdev", but the
> body only clears the pointer:
...
> Could the doc be reworded to say the pointer is cleared and the
> allocation is released by devres, so a later patch adding an explicit
> devm_kfree() does not end up double freeing it?
Will fix in v7. Will reword the kernel-doc to: "Clears the control
plane block pointer. The allocation itself is managed by devres and
freed on driver detach."
Thanks.
--
Jack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-11 7:14 [PATCH v6 0/7] net: wwan: t9xx: Add MediaTek T9XX WWAN driver Jack Wu via B4 Relay
2026-08-11 7:14 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] net: wwan: t9xx: Add PCIe core Jack Wu via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 22:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-11 7:14 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] net: wwan: t9xx: Add control plane transaction layer Jack Wu via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 22:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-18 12:22 ` Wu. JackBB (GSM) [this message]
2026-08-11 7:14 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] net: wwan: t9xx: Add control DMA interface Jack Wu via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 22:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-18 12:24 ` [External Mail] " Wu. JackBB (GSM)
2026-08-11 7:14 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] net: wwan: t9xx: Add control port Jack Wu via B4 Relay
2026-08-11 7:14 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] net: wwan: t9xx: Add FSM thread Jack Wu via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 22:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-11 7:14 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] net: wwan: t9xx: Add AT & MBIM WWAN ports Jack Wu via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 22:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-18 12:41 ` [External Mail] " Wu. JackBB (GSM)
2026-08-11 7:14 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] net: wwan: t9xx: Add maintainers entry Jack Wu via B4 Relay
2026-08-17 22:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-17 22:39 ` [PATCH v6 0/7] net: wwan: t9xx: Add MediaTek T9XX WWAN driver Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-18 12:20 ` [External Mail] " Wu. JackBB (GSM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44acb3c30c574ab2b9571502c3a6ad3f@compal.com \
--to=jackbb_wu@compal.com \
--cc=Jeff_Chang@compal.com \
--cc=Minano.tseng@mediatek.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robert_yu@compal.com \
--cc=ryazanov.s.a@gmail.com \
--cc=shi-wei.yeh@mediatek.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=wen-zhi.huang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox