public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
Cc: "Ricardo B. Marlière" <rbm@suse.com>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"David Ahern" <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
	"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	"Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Ido Schimmel" <idosch@nvidia.com>,
	"Guillaume Nault" <gnault@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11 net-next v5] bpf: remove ipv6_bpf_stub completely and use direct function calls
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:36:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44bc646b-9889-4dc0-9068-b07b6bb7193b@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99c37135-a1cc-4eb9-a910-ca38e129b5b0@suse.de>

On 3/25/26 1:29 PM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
> On 3/25/26 8:11 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
>> On 3/25/26 5:08 AM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
>>> As IPv6 is built-in only, the ipv6_bpf_stub can be removed completely.
>>>
>>> Convert all ipv6_bpf_stub usage to direct function calls instead. The
>>> fallback functions introduced previously will prevent linkage errors
>>> when CONFIG_IPV6 is disabled.
>>
>> Thanks for working on this.
>>
>>> @@ -6221,8 +6215,8 @@ static int bpf_ipv4_fib_lookup(struct net *net, 
>>> struct bpf_fib_lookup *params,
>>>       if (likely(nhc->nhc_gw_family != AF_INET6))
>>>           neigh = __ipv4_neigh_lookup_noref(dev,
>>>                             (__force u32)params->ipv4_dst);
>>> -    else
>>> -        neigh = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref_stub(dev, params->ipv6_dst);
>>> +    else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6))
>>> +        neigh = __ipv6_neigh_lookup_noref(dev, params->ipv6_dst);
>>
>> Should it be ipv6_mod_enabled() instead of IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)?
>> Is nd_tbl always initialized?
>>
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> I don't think so. The IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) check here is just to 
> prevent an undefined reference when compiling with CONFIG_IPV6=n. Note 
> that this code isn't reachable when ipv6.disable=1 is set during 
> booting, as it would have crashed even before this change because 
> ipv6_stub->nd_tbl is NULL if the IPV6 is disabled since booting.
> 
> We addressed the vulnerable paths already during this series:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260307-net-nd_tbl_fixes-v4-0- 
> e2677e85628c@suse.com/#
> 
>>>       if (!neigh || !(READ_ONCE(neigh->nud_state) & NUD_VALID))
>>>           return BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NO_NEIGH;
>>> @@ -6290,12 +6284,11 @@ static int bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup(struct net 
>>> *net, struct bpf_fib_lookup *params,
>>>               params->tbid = 0;
>>>           }
>>> -        tb = ipv6_stub->fib6_get_table(net, tbid);
>>> +        tb = fib6_get_table(net, tbid);
>>>           if (unlikely(!tb))
>>>               return BPF_FIB_LKUP_RET_NOT_FWDED;
>>> -        err = ipv6_stub->fib6_table_lookup(net, tb, oif, &fl6, &res,
>>> -                           strict);
>>> +        err = fib6_table_lookup(net, tb, oif, &fl6, &res, strict);
>>
>> A similar question here and other changes in the patch.
>>
>> I think bpf_ipv6_fib_lookup() is fine because the earlier
>> "!idev" check should fail when ipv6 is disabled at boot time?
> 
> Yes, the !idev check prevents us to reach this path so it is safe to 
> call fib6_table_lookup().
> 
> While working on the series I have been trying to exploit these paths 
> (this one and other changes in the series), so far I didn't find anything.

Thanks for the explanation.

Reviewed-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-25 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-25 12:08 [PATCH 00/11 net-next v5] Convert CONFIG_IPV6 to built-in and remove stubs Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 01/11 net-next v5] ipv6: convert CONFIG_IPV6 to built-in only and clean up Kconfigs Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 02/11 net-next v5] net: remove EXPORT_IPV6_MOD() and EXPORT_IPV6_MOD_GPL() macros Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 03/11 net-next v5] ipv6: replace IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_IPV6) with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 17:33   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 04/11 net-next v5] ipv6: remove dynamic ICMPv6 sender registration infrastructure Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 05/11 net-next v5] ipv6: prepare headers for ipv6_stub removal Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 06/11 net-next v5] drivers: net: drop ipv6_stub usage and use direct function calls Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 07/11 net-next v5] ipv4: " Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 08/11 net-next v5] net: convert remaining ipv6_stub users to " Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 09/11 net-next v5] bpf: remove ipv6_bpf_stub completely and use " Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 19:11   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2026-03-25 20:29     ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 21:36       ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2026-03-25 22:40       ` David Ahern
2026-03-25 23:41         ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-26 16:27           ` David Ahern
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 10/11 net-next v5] ipv6: remove ipv6_stub infrastructure completely Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2026-03-25 12:08 ` [PATCH 11/11 net-next v5] netfilter: remove nf_ipv6_ops and use direct function calls Fernando Fernandez Mancera

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44bc646b-9889-4dc0-9068-b07b6bb7193b@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fmancera@suse.de \
    --cc=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rbm@suse.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox