From: Arseniy Krasnov <oxffffaa@gmail.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@sberdevices.ru
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: send SIGPIPE on write to shutdowned socket
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2023 15:46:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44fef482-579a-fed6-6e8c-d400546285fc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <qgn26mgfotc7qxzp6ad7ezkdex6aqniv32c5tvehxh4hljsnvs@x7wvyvptizxx>
Hi Stefano,
On 02.08.2023 10:46, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:17:26PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>> POSIX requires to send SIGPIPE on write to SOCK_STREAM socket which was
>> shutdowned with SHUT_WR flag or its peer was shutdowned with SHUT_RD
>> flag. Also we must not send SIGPIPE if MSG_NOSIGNAL flag is set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
>> ---
>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> index 020cf17ab7e4..013b65241b65 100644
>> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>> @@ -1921,6 +1921,9 @@ static int vsock_connectible_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
>> err = total_written;
>> }
>> out:
>> + if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
>> + err = sk_stream_error(sk, msg->msg_flags, err);
>
> Do you know why we don't need this for SOCK_SEQPACKET and SOCK_DGRAM?
Yes, here is my explanation:
This function checks that input error is SIGPIPE, and if so it sends SIGPIPE to the 'current' thread
(except case when MSG_NOSIGNAL flag is set). This behaviour is described in POSIX:
Page 367 (description of defines from sys/socket.h):
MSG_NOSIGNAL: No SIGPIPE generated when an attempt to send is made on a stream-
oriented socket that is no longer connected.
Page 497 (description of SOCK_STREAM):
A SIGPIPE signal is raised if a thread sends on a broken stream (one that is
no longer connected).
Page 1802 (description of 'send()' call):
MSG_NOSIGNAL
Requests not to send the SIGPIPE signal if an attempt to
send is made on a stream-oriented socket that is no
longer connected. The [EPIPE] error shall still be
returned
And the same for 'sendto()' and 'sendmsg()'
Link to the POSIX document:
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/open/n4217.pdf
TCP (I think we must rely on it), KCM, SMC sockets (all of them are stream) work in the same
way by calling this function. AF_UNIX also works in the same way, but it implements SIGPIPE handling
without this function.
The only thing that confused me a little bit, that sockets above returns EPIPE when
we have only SEND_SHUTDOWN set, but for AF_VSOCK EPIPE is returned for RCV_SHUTDOWN
also, but I think it is related to this patchset.
Thanks, Arseniy
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
>> +
>> release_sock(sk);
>> return err;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-04 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-01 14:17 [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] vsock: handle writes to shutdowned socket Arseniy Krasnov
2023-08-01 14:17 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] vsock: send SIGPIPE on write " Arseniy Krasnov
2023-08-02 7:46 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-08-04 12:46 ` Arseniy Krasnov [this message]
2023-08-04 14:28 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-08-04 14:34 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-08-04 15:02 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-08-04 16:24 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-08-14 19:40 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-08-22 9:36 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-08-14 19:46 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-08-22 9:39 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-08-22 12:51 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-08-01 14:17 ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] test/vsock: shutdowned socket test Arseniy Krasnov
2023-08-02 8:00 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-08-04 12:48 ` Arseniy Krasnov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44fef482-579a-fed6-6e8c-d400546285fc@gmail.com \
--to=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
--cc=AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).