From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Drake Subject: Re: ieee80211 and devices which decrypt in hardware Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:43:44 -0400 Message-ID: <450889A0.1050100@gentoo.org> References: <45077241.1070102@gentoo.org> <200609131627.58153.mb@bu3sch.de> <450887B9.7080308@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Buesch , netdev@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhu@intel.com, ipw2100-admin@linux.intel.com Return-path: Received: from smtp131.iad.emailsrvr.com ([207.97.245.131]:4314 "EHLO smtp131.iad.emailsrvr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751235AbWIMWor (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:44:47 -0400 To: Daniel Drake In-Reply-To: <450887B9.7080308@gentoo.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Daniel Drake wrote: > adding IEEE802.11 header parsing code to > zd1211rw rx path (currently there is none, which is nice) Oops, that's obviously a lie. Anyway, I still think it's easier/better to do in the stack, would you agree? That just leaves questions about whether it should be a new flag, special value for ieee->host_decrypt, etc. Daniel