From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/23] e1000: Maybe stop TX if not enough free descriptors
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:38:01 -0400
Message-ID: <45104719.9080708@pobox.com>
References: <20060919172623.4605.56860.stgit@gitlost.site> <20060919172859.4605.60855.stgit@gitlost.site>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	"Kok, Auke" <auke@foo-projects.org>,
	"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:14524 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751053AbWISTiD (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 19 Sep 2006 15:38:03 -0400
To: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060919172859.4605.60855.stgit@gitlost.site>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Actually, I rescind the ACK.

The code should be inside a spinlock, and therefore not need this 
additional check.

If this check were truly needed, then SMP code all over the kernel would 
be broken.