From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Horms <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Wensong Zhang <wensong@linux-vs.org>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Joseph Mack NA3T <jmack@wm7d.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] Make sure ip_vs_ftp ports are valid
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:29:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45111819.1030309@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060904020253.GA8761@verge.net.au>
Horms wrote:
> Here is the revised patch.
>
>
> [IPVS] Make sure ip_vs_ftp ports are valid
>
> I'm not entirely sure what happens in the case of a valid port,
> at best it'll be silently ignored. This patch ensures that
> the port values are unsigned short values, and thus always valid.
>
> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> Signed-Off-By: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c 2006-09-04
10:47:09.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6/net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c 2006-09-04 10:59:30.000000000
+0900
> @@ -44,8 +44,8 @@
> * List of ports (up to IP_VS_APP_MAX_PORTS) to be handled by helper
> * First port is set to the default port.
> */
> -static int ports[IP_VS_APP_MAX_PORTS] = {21, 0};
> -module_param_array(ports, int, NULL, 0);
> +static unsigned short ports[IP_VS_APP_MAX_PORTS] = {21, 0};
> +module_param_array(ports, ushort, NULL, 0);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(ports, "Ports to monitor for FTP control commands");
>
> /*
It looks like the wrong patch went in:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git-commits-head&m=115862407021941&w=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-20 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-01 10:10 [patch 0/4] ip_vs_ftp cleanups Horms
2006-09-01 10:10 ` [patch 1/4] Document the ports option to ip_vs_ftp in kernel-parameters.txt Horms
2006-09-01 10:10 ` [patch 2/4] auto-help for ip_vs_ftp Horms
2006-09-01 10:10 ` [patch 3/4] Make sure ip_vs_ftp ports are valid Horms
2006-09-03 23:09 ` Patrick McHardy
2006-09-04 0:44 ` Horms
2006-09-04 2:02 ` Horms
2006-09-20 10:29 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2006-09-20 14:49 ` Horms
2006-09-01 10:10 ` [patch 4/4] remove the debug option go ip_vs_ftp Horms
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45111819.1030309@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=jmack@wm7d.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).