From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Larry Finger Subject: Re: kernel: TKIP: replay detected: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:10:33 -0500 Message-ID: <451837B9.8060802@lwfinger.net> References: <20060924104053.GA6645@frodo.home.lxtec.de> <20060925144954.GC16949@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.116]:46014 "EHLO mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750914AbWIYUKk (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:10:40 -0400 To: Matthieu CASTET In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Matthieu CASTET wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:50:00 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 12:40:53PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: >> >>> My sylog is filled up with thousands of: >>> Sep 21 18:18:00 aragorn kernel: TKIP: replay detected: \ >>> STA=XX:XX:BB:LL:KK:00 previous TSC 00000000BLAa received TSC 00000000BLAa >>> Sep 21 18:18:29 aragorn kernel: printk: 62 messages suppressed. >> Opinion seems to be running that these messages are useless and should >> be removed. Anyone disagree? >> > They could be useful for debugging. > > Instead of removing them, enable them when a DEBUG flags is enabled. What condition do they indicate when the two are equal? As you probably saw, I sent a patch that disables them in that case, but still print the message when received < previous. Would that be acceptable? Larry