From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matthieu castet Subject: Re: softmac mtu Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:58:44 +0200 Message-ID: <451C0D54.5050904@free.fr> References: <20060925200125.GF16949@tuxdriver.com> <20060927143905.721ddf3e@griffin.suse.cz> <1159365434.451a833ae7728@imp3-g19.free.fr> <1159365316.2698.40.camel@ux156> <451AB215.3080500@free.fr> <1159429162.2648.0.camel@ux156> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jiri Benc , "John W. Linville" , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.30]:22458 "EHLO smtp4-g19.free.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751884AbWI1R6r (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:58:47 -0400 To: Johannes Berg In-Reply-To: <1159429162.2648.0.camel@ux156> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 19:17 +0200, matthieu castet wrote: > > >>>2304, I think, as that's >>>synonym sMaxMsduLng Integer = 2304; /* max octets in an MSDU */ >>> >> >>Yes but if it is bigger the frame get framented at the 802.11 layer : in >>theory we could put mtu (IP max packet size) a big as we want [1]. > > > No, you're confusing MPDU and MSDU. Or I am :) Please try to read the > spec as well. > Right, Thanks for the clarification. Matthieu