From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joshua Brindle Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] secid reconciliation-v03: Enforcement for SELinux Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:52:55 -0400 Message-ID: <451C9897.6030306@gentoo.org> References: <451C85F4.7000406@trustedcs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, jmorris@namei.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov, paul.moore@hp.com Return-path: Received: from tresys.irides.com ([216.250.243.126]:24435 "HELO exchange.columbia.tresys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161103AbWI2DxZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:53:25 -0400 To: Venkat Yekkirala In-Reply-To: <451C85F4.7000406@trustedcs.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Venkat Yekkirala wrote: > > + > + err = avc_has_perm(xfrm_sid, skb->secmark, SECCLASS_PACKET, > + PACKET__FLOW_IN, NULL); > + if (err) > + goto out; > + > + if (xfrm_sid) { > + err = security_transition_sid(xfrm_sid, skb->secmark, > + SECCLASS_PACKET, &trans_sid); > + if (err) > + goto out; > + > I thought we weren't doing transitions to label packets anymore per the conference call?